In many cases, when assessing the quality of work, examiners pay attention to the introduction and conclusion. In this regard, it is necessary to finish the article, as well as to begin it, on a strong note. And experienced researchers, when studying publications in journals, often start reading from the end, trying to assess the scale of the contribution to the development of science.
When writing a conclusion, the introduction to poland number for whatsapp the article is of great importance . These parts should have a clear relationship with each other. What was said in the introduction is confirmed or refuted at the end of the article.
The conclusion is not just a listing or copying of the introductory and main parts, but a contrast between the formulated tasks and the results. The author objectively presents the obtained result and draws a conclusion on how effective the actions, tools, methods, etc. were.
What to write in the conclusion
Considering the function of the conclusion of a scientific article, it is necessary to:
Repeat the main ideas of the main part of the work in a condensed form. When describing them, you need to use new phrases and formulations.
Summarize the results obtained. The conclusion should clearly indicate what you have arrived at in the end.
Compare the results obtained with the goal that was set at the beginning. It is necessary to indicate precisely whether the stated goal was achieved and to what extent, whether the hypothesis was confirmed, whether all tasks were completed.
To demonstrate provisions revealed for the first time is to demonstrate scientific novelty. This is especially true for practical research, during which new facts may be discovered.
Explain in what area the obtained results can be applied. This helps to show the theoretical and practical significance of the article.
After describing the conclusions, it is useful to make a forecast of possible changes in the topic under consideration. In parallel, it is worthwhile to determine the directions for further development in the studied area, as well as to give recommendations that logically follow from the results of the work performed. Several open questions can be asked so that the reader can reflect. But these questions should come from the results (serve as a forecast), and not from the goals and objectives set at the beginning.